Discussion 2: Comparing Data Collection Methods

   Required Readings Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for requisite explorationers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Chapter 1, “An Introduction to Codes and Coding (pp. 1–42) (previously decipher in Weeks 5, 6, and 7) Chapter 2, “Writing Analytic Memos About Narrative and Visual Data” (pp. 43–65) (previously decipher in Weeks 5, 6, and 7) Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2016). Requisite exploration: Bridging the conceptual, presumptive, and processological. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Chapter 5, “Methods of Grounds Collection” (pp. 145–183) (previously decipher in Week 7) Chapter 7, “An Integrative Approach to Grounds Analysis” (pp. 215–236) (previously decipher in Weeks 5, 6, and 7) Chapter 8, “Methods and Processes of Grounds Analysis” (pp. 237–270) (previously decipher in Weeks 5, 6, and 7) Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Requisite colloquying: The art of hearing grounds (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Chapter 12, “Data Analysis in the Responsive Interviewing Model” (pp. 189–211) (previously decipher in Weeks 5, 6, and 7) Chapter 14, “Personal Reflections on Responsive Interviewing” Document: Excel Video Coding Document Template (Excel spreadsheet) Reexamination this Excel template as you examination this week’s media program cognate to coding. Also, you earn use this template for reorganizing and reanalyzing grounds. Required Media Laureate Education (Producer). (2016). Succor cycle coding [Video improve]. Baltimore, MD: Author.    Microsoft Word Link - WAL_RSCH8310_co_programtranscript_EN.docx Note:  The abut prolixity of this media element is 6 minutes. In this media program, Dr. Susan Marcus, Core Exploration Faculty delay the School of Psychology at Walden University, introduces succor cycle coding. She discusses the meaning of reorganizing and reanalyzing grounds from leading cycle coding. She earn besides unfold using this process. For this Discussion, you earn discuss incongruous grounds collation processs and entice comparisons. You besides earn weigh strengths, weaknesses, and the challenges they may introduce. To ad for this Discussion: Reexamination this week’s Learning Resources cognate to codes and coding. Consider the similarities and differences in the grounds unmoved from your interexamination and from the transcripts of the Scholars of Change videos. Consider the other grounds collation processs you premeditated (convergence groups, reviews of documents and collective media; and your own memos and notes). Reexamination your Major Assignment 1, paying study to the alignment betwixt your exploration interrogation and considerations for grounds collation. Post a rejoinder to the following: From the grounds you unmoved and other grounds collation processs you premeditated, assimilate and opposition the strengths and weaknesses of at lowest two grounds collation processs. Embrace an explication of your proof using these incongruous grounds collation processs. Also, embrace an explication of what you endow troublesome or challenging and why. Explain how you as the explorationer can determine that your choices for grounds collation align delay your exploration interrogations. Use your proof from Major Assignment 1 as an stance. Be positive to assistance your main shaft and rejoinder shaft delay relation to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly sign in APA title.