In the communication of this essay, you accomplish exhibit the role of an singular who cheered the American Cut (a Patriot or Whig). Loyalist James Chalmers, inferior the obscurity of Candidus, wrote Plain Faithfulness in tally to Thomas Paine’s glorious brochure Common Sense. The essay should be a reserve of 250 language in protraction. Try not to constitute assumptions. Instead, exhibit the unvarnished role of someone who lived in the colonies in the limit up to, and including, the American Revolution. You could be a Colonial politician, a importer, a yeoman, a abundance possessor, or flush a Southern school possessor. Shape your essay in in hostility to Chalmer’s dispute.
Here is the dispute of constantist James Chalmers:
"I enjoy lawful heard the intelligence of a diminutive order of ruffians who enjoy dumped a abundant aggregate of tea into the Boston Harbor. The moderate relation was that this order was a unsystematic knot of Indians. I dregs to be influenced by the inferiorground fractions harass that abides to indulge us after a while faithless relations and slanted viewpoints that livelihood a protestation opposite the Crown. I and abundant constant Colonists enjoy establish the faithfulness to this relation. The ruffians were in-fact a order of men, most of them are associated after a while the underdosed association of Masons. The flusht demonstrates a unserviceable perdition of characteristic opposite the East India Company. I am communication to impart you that the tea which was destroyed was sent to the Colonies to be sold at a very competitive figure as the East India Tea Company has a balance of tea. King George has identified the sale of this tea to avail the Colonies. This tea would enjoy besides helped the financial declare of the East India Tea Company of which we positively prospect would alight solvent. We enjoy besides establish impartation alluding to the tea smuggling operations of John Hancock and other of the protestation livelihooders. Could it be that the tea in Boston Harbor was destroyed to prepisode competitive pricing of tea? (are we barely changing tax collectors?) Why do we abide to irritate King George by unserviceable acts of characteristic detriment? I push you all to deduce the figure we would pay for protestation opposite the Crown. Some of our Colonists call this cut but you must acquire that this is a prodigious hazard, any actions opposite the Crown enact a unaffected protestation.